randomness: (Default)
[personal profile] randomness
marginaleye, referencing the MySpace to Facebook to Google+ trend: "I fear, however, the horrible possibility that social networking is going to be a perpetual treadmill of pursuing the 'in crowd' and fleeing prole drift, stretching out from here to infinity."

Well, it is how clubbing seems to go. Some dance clubs do last a while, but the crowd does seem to follow the trendiest new place. So there is some social precedent here.

I suppose if one was creating a social networking site one might keep that particular dynamic in mind.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-07-12 09:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bloodstones.livejournal.com
Good goth clubs, however, often have a lot of staying power and a dedicated following. How's fetlife doing?

(no subject)

Date: 2011-07-12 09:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] st-rev.livejournal.com
Some are like nightclubs, some are like bars.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-07-12 10:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jab2.livejournal.com
and yet, fewer of my friends have to use earplugs to survive a night on a social networking site.... :)

(no subject)

Date: 2011-07-12 11:55 pm (UTC)
dpolicar: (Default)
From: [personal profile] dpolicar
If I were creating a social networking site, I would design it with a distributed open-access data model, such that people could create and use new apps/front ends without needing to "migrate," and could adopt a best-of-breed approach across multiple apps without having to keep recreating the social network data.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-07-13 01:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] serendipity9000.livejournal.com
I find it exhausting to even think about checking ANOTHER place for updates. Honestly, I currently find LJ the most pleasant to read.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-07-13 02:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dirque.livejournal.com
Both FB and google+ is about the ease of finding and adding people. LJ assumes they'll find you if they really try.

While I don't think Google+ is a winner- their graphic design is atrocious- it always lacks that final polish. I think it's good enough to destroy the one social network to rule them model. To me G+ is too much like FM calculator watches.

It tells time! It calculates! I can listen to the radiooooooo.

But is it something grandma would use?

(no subject)

Date: 2011-07-13 04:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] miss-chance.livejournal.com
What perplexes me in this quote is why this is a "horrible possibility." It's socializing. Socialization has flow and change. What's the big deal? Why is is this bad in any way?

(no subject)

Date: 2011-07-13 08:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] achinhibitor.livejournal.com
Sounds like we need a social networking system which has an infinite number of alternative sectors. Then one can engage in the infinite cycle of moving to a cooler sector while fleeing the less-cool who have arrived at one's current sector.

Profile

randomness: (Default)
Randomness

November 2024

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
171819 20212223
24252627282930

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags