I've been so tired these past few days that I wonder if I'm actually sick
Mar. 13th, 2026 07:43 am( Read more... )
highlights included:
otherwise everything is still Migraine World Summit (though I have once again learned a useful thing today! neck pain can be a prodrome symptom!) and Special Interest.

Which of these look interesting?
The Lion and the Deathless Dark by Carissa Broadbent (July 2026)
4 (14.3%)
Teach Me to Prey by Jenni Howell (December 2026)
0 (0.0%)
Heart of Thieves by Jessica S. Olson (September 2026)
0 (0.0%)
The Dagger in Vichy by Alastair Reynolds (October 2025)
12 (42.9%)
Crows and Silences by Lucius Shepard (December 2024)
9 (32.1%)
Engines of Reason by Adrian Tchaikovsky (September 2026)
12 (42.9%)
The Heart of the Reproach by Adrian Tchaikovsky (July 2025)
10 (35.7%)
Some other option (see comments)
0 (0.0%)
Cats!
22 (78.6%)
Goodness knows, some real weirdness is revealed in You Be the Judge in Guardian Saturday, but today's produces a theory which is entirely new to me -
But apart from all this hoohah about HYGIENE, I am rather taken with New Health Scare Theory:
Boiling water twice is a no-no for me – there is a change in quality and taste. My life had a certain drabness to it – I now attribute that to consuming poor-quality water for so long without realising.
I was going to ask are they living in a log cabin or what in Ohio if the kitchen is so freezingly cold in the mornings they have to warm up the mugs so that they do not immediately chill the coffee but I see the issue is poor insulation.
Maybe they should do something about insulation rather than bicker over 'secondhand water'?
In apparent celebration of Migraine World Summit, I have spent this evening having an unscheduled migraine attack for no obvious reason. I disapprove. (Because I've been doing a lot of audiovisual processing, captions notwithstanding? Because I had my screen much brighter than usual for a while playing a colours game?* Because oven't?)
Nonetheless I have watched and made digital notes on all of 2026 Day 2, watched and made digital notes on 3/4 talks from 2025 Day 2 (which I missed at the time), and made physical notes for 2025 Day 1 and 1/4 of Day 2. I am... sort of catching up.
I am really enjoying my pens. I also find myself with the problem of wanting lots of different notebooks and, also, to keep everything in One Single Solitary Notebook, For Convenience...
* NB I am a rocks nerd. My colour discrimination is ludicrously good. I am sorry that that link is weird and competitive about my ridiculous score, but not sorry enough to provide you with the bare link.
Or whatever. This is clearly my week for being Grumpy Archivist.
Have been solicited to review article for journal with which I have had a long connection, following a recent backstory I will not go into.
But anyway, I have been asked to review it, and it is definitely Within My Purlieu -
Perhaps too much so, because on opening the document to check that it in fact was, the person sending it having given me no indication of what it was about -
Discovered it was based upon an archive with which I had a significant history.
And no, the fact that there is this beautiful and fairly substantial archive in lovely curated order available to the researcher is a lot less down to the creating body (okay, I will give them points for the stuff actually having survived in fairly good nick) than to the work of archivists over 2-3 decades acquiring the material (in batches as it turned up during office moves and so on), sorting it into some kind of coherent order, and cataloguing it.
A saga which is actually recounted in the online catalogue to the collection, not to mention an article wot I writ about the organisation in question.
It is actually a pretty cool organisation, compared to some I have had dealings with, but superior archive processing, not really in their skill-set.
Grump. Will try and make tactful point about acknowledging the labour of archivists....
***
We may recall the saga of the tech bro whose sprog did not want the AI teddy he had acquired for her to talk back, and turned the speech facility off, his head around this he could not get -
And this is very creepy, no lessons have been learnt: AI toys for children misread emotions and respond inappropriately, researchers warn:
The parents in the study were interested in the toy's potential to teach language and communication skills.
However, their children frequently struggled to converse with it. Gabbo didn't hear their interruptions, talked over them, could not differentiate between child and adult voices and responded awkwardly to declarations of affection.
When one five-year-old said, "I love you," to the toy, it replied: "As a friendly reminder, please ensure interactions adhere to the guidelines provided. Let me know how you would like to proceed."
The concern is that at a developmental stage where children are learning about social interaction and cues, generative AI output could be confusing.


I currently have a bit of a special interest happening, right. So I spent a bit of today's therapy session talking about it, as one does, and then meandered around to one of my current Big Topics[1], and made it all the way through to the wrapping-up stage of proceedings!
... when My Favourite Metaphor About Therapy abruptly suggested itself to me and I had. A Moment.
Which is how I found myself explaining that, in a thematically appropriate coincidence, said favourite metaphor is "emotional heavy lifting, with trained spotter".
To which came the response: "... can I. borrow that."
And thus: A Good Grade In Therapy.
[1] social anxiety. it's the social anxiety.