You keep reading things I am not saying.

Date: 2011-08-09 10:12 pm (UTC)
Measuring a currency against gold is only interesting if the value of gold is somehow constant.

Again, not so. (Perhaps it is not interesting to you, I'll grant that.) I am measuring the monetary unit's pegged value in 1914 to the value of gold today, expressed in that unit's current value. I am not talking about buying power, and I have consistently and explicitly not been doing so throughout this entire thread. In those terms, gold's value is the only thing that is constant: that gold sovereign's defined weight has not changed.

I understand very clearly what you are saying--btw, your deflator site is in dollars, not pounds, and pounds have depreciated quite a bit against dollars in the last century, so the number is incorrect expressed in pounds, but that is a side-note--but I don't think you understand why it's entirely irrelevant to my post.

What I am doing is not what you think I am doing. I have been very clear about what I am doing, and you keep talking about a different subject entirely throughout this entire comment thread.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

randomness: (Default)
Randomness

November 2024

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
171819 20212223
24252627282930

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags