I know there are practical reasons, but three and a half years after the changeover I find myself nostalgic for some of the old notes. It isn't just the variety of designs, but the subjects. Even the obscure ones were a view into the nation's view of itself.
The euro notes were specifically designed to be generic. Quoting http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/1735880.stm:
"One note had to be redesigned when it proved in fact to be a real bridge. And not from Europe, but from India."
Even the name was carefully chosen not to offend. And more or less, the European Central Bank succeeded. But the result looks a bit like toy money.
http://www.ecb.int/bc/banknotes/looks/html/index.en.html
I don't mean this as a criticism of the designer, Robert Kalina of the Oesterreichische Nationalbank. He did as good a job as possible within the existing political constraints, which were many and must have made his job a frustrating exercise.
But look at some of the notes they replaced:
Still, one of my favorite notes doesn't even have a person on it, so that objection doesn't arise. It's just got a big sunflower.
The old notes had national distinctiveness and character. The new ones are bland.
But that's progress, I guess. And international political compromise.
[Edit: http://www.admirabledesign.com/-Designs-de-l-euro- shows some of the designs that weren't chosen.]
The euro notes were specifically designed to be generic. Quoting http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/1735880.stm:
"One note had to be redesigned when it proved in fact to be a real bridge. And not from Europe, but from India."
Even the name was carefully chosen not to offend. And more or less, the European Central Bank succeeded. But the result looks a bit like toy money.
http://www.ecb.int/bc/banknotes/looks/html/index.en.html
I don't mean this as a criticism of the designer, Robert Kalina of the Oesterreichische Nationalbank. He did as good a job as possible within the existing political constraints, which were many and must have made his job a frustrating exercise.
But look at some of the notes they replaced:
- Sigmund Freud
- Rene Magritte (I particularly like the back.)
- Jean Sibelius
- Antoine de Saint-Exupéry, complete with the Little Prince
- Carl Friedrich Gauss and his distribution
- Athena
- A smiling James Joyce
- Vasco da Gama
- A very politically incorrect Hernan Cortés and Francisco Pizarro
Still, one of my favorite notes doesn't even have a person on it, so that objection doesn't arise. It's just got a big sunflower.
The old notes had national distinctiveness and character. The new ones are bland.
But that's progress, I guess. And international political compromise.
[Edit: http://www.admirabledesign.com/-Designs-de-l-euro- shows some of the designs that weren't chosen.]
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-04 05:02 pm (UTC)Isn't that possible with the bills, too?
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-04 05:08 pm (UTC)They did! There are even commemorative 2 euro coins.
Isn't that possible with the bills, too?
It's possible, sure. But they decided not to.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-04 05:16 pm (UTC)Not having people I can understand, but maybe aesthetically pleasing objects are worth offending a few people over every now and then.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-04 05:30 pm (UTC)It really is one of my favorite banknotes. There's a great watermark of the bee in the sunflower that you can just make out in that blank white bit at the top.
When the national currencies were phased out, NPR interviewed the man who designed that bill and the other Dutch currency. He was, unsurprisingly, disappointed in the new currency.
I'm sorry I missed that!
Not having people I can understand, but maybe aesthetically pleasing objects are worth offending a few people over every now and then.
I'd think so, too.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-04 05:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-04 05:33 pm (UTC)That BBC story made a similar comment: ""Euro" - widely judged to be a boring lowest common denominator - only came into its own as the least offensive option much later."
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-04 05:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-04 05:39 pm (UTC)Absolutely! I keep a bit myself, just to keep things simple when I arrive.
And for all my earlier griping, they still look better than American money.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-04 05:43 pm (UTC)One thing I do like about them is the unifying "architecture through the ages" theme, with the largest denominations having the most recent architectural designs.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-04 05:43 pm (UTC)Can there ever be enough geeking? :)
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-04 05:49 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-04 05:51 pm (UTC):) Could be.
Although the older bills? So much better than the new notes.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-04 05:51 pm (UTC)If money wasn't so political... If they put Regan on a coin, I might not use it at all.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-04 05:55 pm (UTC)At least the euro does have a lot of convenience for us foreigners to make up for the nostalgia. I must admit that I do NOT miss changing from francs to lire to marks and having a wallet full of every currency except the one I happen to need at the moment...
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-04 06:03 pm (UTC)this one?
Nice!
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-04 06:16 pm (UTC)The short answer is "Politics".
The longer answer is that they really wanted to switch from a $1 bill to a $1 coin, but they realized that the Anthony dollar was so unpopular they'd have to change the design if they were to have any hope of getting people to accept it. Putting Sacagawea on the coin was a way to satisfy the Native American lobby without annoying the women's lobby. Much.
In reality, they didn't have any real hope of getting people to accept it without withdrawing the dollar bill...but that was never an option, again because of politics.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-04 06:21 pm (UTC)Don't look now, but there's legislation making its way through Congress to put all the presidents on dollar coins, four presidents a year, along the lines of the state quarter program:
http://money.cnn.com/2005/04/27/pf/new_dollar/index.htm?section=money_latest
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-04 07:32 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-04 09:22 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-04 09:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-04 11:37 pm (UTC)I agree with you. Why not keep the single currency but allow design variations, like the Euro coins and U.S. state quarters?
I'm also disappointed that they would never print U.S. money with artists, musicians, or scientists.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-05 06:39 pm (UTC)It makes sense, doesn't it? I don't know.
I'm also disappointed that they would never print U.S. money with artists, musicians, or scientists.
Me too, but can you imagine the political battles? Britain has Charles Darwin on the £10 note; some people would want to put whoever it is behind the Intelligent Design movement on some piece of currency.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-05 06:45 pm (UTC)