Compare and contrast.
Jan. 9th, 2007 02:56 amThought for the late night, partly inspired by a face-to-face comment by
rmd about gay regency romances mostly being written by and read by women, and partly from a post by
digitalemur called Fun with YAOI, or things I come across at work:
Is there any similarity in this kind of man-to-man fiction mostly created and read by women to the girl-on-girl photosets mostly being photographed by and viewed by men?
Note: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yaoi has a useful overview of the yaoi phenomenon.
Is there any similarity in this kind of man-to-man fiction mostly created and read by women to the girl-on-girl photosets mostly being photographed by and viewed by men?
Note: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yaoi has a useful overview of the yaoi phenomenon.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-09 11:00 am (UTC)Also, I think there's a better understanding of what excites men, just in terms of there being a porn industry that caters to them. There is a lot of porn aimed at het men and a lot for gay men, and a lot of women both gay and straight consume this porn because there isn't much really made for them. I mean, try to find some porn for gay women? It's just about impossible.
I will say this for me, at least, as a reader and writer of yaoi and slash, I like it and want to read and write it because I identify with the male characters. I want them to be men, acting like men, so what I prefer to read and write, is the less romancy sort of stuff. Ultimately, I write and read it because I want to be one of those men.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-09 04:54 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-10 12:57 am (UTC)I've never tried any of GoodVibe's videos, but I'll have to investigate. I think it is starting to be available, it's just that there isn't as much of a history of erotica aimed at lesbians.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-10 04:52 am (UTC)