"That stampede you're hearing? It's folks running for the exits."
The biggest problem right now is that no one has any clue who all are holding the bag, or even how big the damn bag is. So while it doesn't hurt that the Fed and the ECB are opening the credit windows and throwing money at the banks, that doesn't make any of the banks less fearful and suspicious of each other.
And fear and suspicion? Bad for markets, just like they're bad for any other relationships.
The biggest problem right now is that no one has any clue who all are holding the bag, or even how big the damn bag is. So while it doesn't hurt that the Fed and the ECB are opening the credit windows and throwing money at the banks, that doesn't make any of the banks less fearful and suspicious of each other.
And fear and suspicion? Bad for markets, just like they're bad for any other relationships.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-08-16 02:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-08-16 02:27 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-08-16 02:41 pm (UTC)My favorite piece on that site was a weekly analysis piece called "The Five Dumbest Things on Wall Street This Week", but I have to say it's gone downhill.
But you may be watching Jim Cramer for the ranting. :)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-08-16 04:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-08-16 02:33 pm (UTC)What steams me is that it did not have to happen, and it shouldn't have happened. Throwing easy credit at people without the means to pay it back propped up the economy for a few years, and hey, guess what, our new President will have yet another disaster inherited from the Shrub.
Grrrrr.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-08-16 02:44 pm (UTC)I wouldn't worry about it; your time horizon has got to be at least a decade or two before retirement, so occasional dips like this you can made up for. If you were planning on retiring next year, that'd be another story.
I will say that easy credit goes all the way back to the tech bust, so I'm not going to pin this on the Shrub.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-08-16 04:46 pm (UTC)hm... correct about the timeline for easy credit, though I don't think people (your average Joes and Janes) really noticed until after Shrub came into office. Remember all those folks predicting a huge economic crash after 9/11? It would have been far worse if easy credit hadn't stuck around.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-08-16 08:00 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-08-16 02:40 pm (UTC)I'm gonna wait a couple of years and see what happens.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-08-17 01:44 am (UTC)http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/15/business/15fund.html?_r=1&pagewanted=print&oref=slogin
(no subject)
Date: 2007-08-16 04:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-08-16 04:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-08-16 08:28 pm (UTC)My plan is to pick up companies I already believe in, either because I've worked there and know they have good people (this includes GS; I'm delighted at its plunge over the last week, because I believe that they will still find a way to do well over the next couple of years) or because I've been following their stories for a while.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-08-16 04:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-08-16 08:02 pm (UTC)1. people are defaulting on loans now, but remember that's only the people who picked up ARM loans in2001- 2002, what about all the people in 2003-2004? On average housing prices have only come down 2%.
2. credit markets are only beginning to tighten in the past 6 months with lack of qualified buyers, the market will soon be flooded with properties.
3. demographically, babyboomers were born from 1946 (post ww2) to 1950. The first year they qualify for social security is at age 62 with full benefits starting at 68. So the shift from work housing to retirement housing will begin at 2008 at the earliest with the shift going to full swing post 2014.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-08-17 02:29 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-08-17 02:53 am (UTC)Speaking only for myself, the instability would make me not want to buy in the shortrun if my time frame for ownership was short-- say, 3-5 years seemed likely. I would want to buy in the shortrun if I expected to be in place for 7+ years. But other conclusions are certainly reasonable.
--Adam
(no subject)
Date: 2007-08-17 03:03 am (UTC)