randomness: (Default)
[personal profile] randomness
People who make predictions which later turn out to be completely wrong destroy their credibility, at least with me.

I'm not sure why this is. We're all wrong sometimes, aren't we?

Nonetheless, it's what happens. Personally, I find the more confident they were at the beginning, the less I respect them later. But many people seem to have made good livings of appearing sure of themselves, and it seems like those livings are dependent on never admitting that they were ever wrong, or showing a bit of doubt.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-07-01 02:11 pm (UTC)
dpolicar: (Default)
From: [personal profile] dpolicar
Well, if someone interviews or consults you, what they pretty much want to hear is "This is the outcome to bank on." To the degree that you say to them "Gee, anything could happen!" they're unlikely to interview or consult you again.

But yeah, I share your attitude towards supposed certainty.

I was convinced that Bush would win the 2004 election by pulling bin Laden out of a hat in late October. But I didn't mention the fact to many people.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-07-01 02:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] r-ness.livejournal.com
Clearly, this is why William Kristol landed a job as a columnist for the New York Times.

From http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/06/re-reading-kris.html#more:

"I have a bunch of books in my Ptown shack, remnants of summer reading from years gone by and I stumbled across a classic yesterday: "The War Over Iraq" by Lawrence Kaplan and Bill Kristol. It's an Encounter book from 2002/2003 before the invasion, and Kristol should hope it's out of print. Reading it years later, its tone and content are shockingly off-base, and most of its core assertions and arguments categorically refuted by history. In fact, it would be very hard to think of a piece of analysis so riddled with misconceptions and errors and so self-evidently wrong in almost every respect only five years later. For errors this huge, of course, and a tenacious refusal to admit them and account for them, is what gives a writer a prestigious perch at the New York Times."

Sully rants some more about how Kristol has never owned up in any way to his mistakes, but you get the drift.

Profile

randomness: (Default)
Randomness

November 2024

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
171819 20212223
24252627282930

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags