Lehman Brothers looks like it's going to file for bankruptcy tonight.
Merrill Lynch is selling itself to Bank of America to avoid a similar fate.
American International Group has asked the Federal Reserve for a $40 billion loan.
It's the phase of the moon! :) Or the phase of the business cycle, anyway.
Merrill Lynch is selling itself to Bank of America to avoid a similar fate.
American International Group has asked the Federal Reserve for a $40 billion loan.
It's the phase of the moon! :) Or the phase of the business cycle, anyway.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-15 02:58 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-15 03:04 am (UTC)ML is one of my company's clients. They had a whole buncha bigwigs show up last week for an on-site visit. Nobody really knew what it was all about but there was a clear sense of Big Tension among all the higher-ups. I wonder if they were actually BoA types evaluating us to determine whether or not to remain a client.
Again, I say unto thee, whoa.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-15 03:05 am (UTC)Last time, with Freddie and Fannie, it definitely was. That announcement was timed so that it happened before Asian market open, in large part because so much of their paper was in Asian hands.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-15 03:07 am (UTC)Actually, you should check out bankrate.com's rating site: http://www.bankrate.com/brm/safesound/ss_home.asp
They only update quarterly, and as we've seen, three months is a long time. But it's something.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-15 03:14 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-15 03:38 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-15 04:56 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-15 04:57 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-15 05:21 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-15 11:40 am (UTC)And yes, I thought "they can't do that!" even in the dream.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-15 03:09 pm (UTC)Also, do you have any links or recommended reading on the mathematical side of all this? I'd like to give a presentation on this stuff for our math students, but it has to have some actual math in it...
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-15 09:38 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-15 09:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-15 09:51 pm (UTC)I don't actually have any links on the math. I try really hard not to invest in anything I don't understand. I agree that it would make a great presentation, though. You'll probably want to talk to someone in the econ or finance departments about that.
I'm interested in hearing the presentation and I'm sorry I can't help. :(
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-15 09:52 pm (UTC)(Please don't blame the messenger. :) )
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-15 10:15 pm (UTC)I am going to start with basics like how to amortize a given principle amount at a given interest rate and such, but I'd like to get into how mortgage-based instruments were created and how they were rated and such...it is extremely interesting and timely but a bit further out of my comfort zone than I would like.
We have waaay less than $100,000 but some doom-mongers are predicting a run on the FDIC. Should I be concerned?
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-16 01:13 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-16 03:03 am (UTC)But if the FDIC runs out of money, they just fall back on the $70 billion credit line they have with the Treasury. If they look like they're going to run through that, the Treasury can raise the FDIC's credit line. And, of course, the Treasury cannot run out of dollars, as they can simply inflate their way out of the problem by issuing more debt. Ultimately, this becomes a problem, but it does backstop the deposit institutions. (Well, I suppose they could raise taxes. Stop laughing. :) )
Given the choice between a bank panic and inflation, the precedent is that the government will go with inflation. Arguably, this is even the right choice. In any case, it's fairly clear that they'll hand you back your money and keep their promise, even if they have to print it just for you.
I'm sure that's reassuring.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-16 08:10 am (UTC)http://www.derivativesstrategy.com/magazine/archive/1999/0899qa.asp
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-16 08:15 am (UTC)http://www.derivativesstrategy.com/magazine/archive/1997/1296qa.asp
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-16 08:30 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-16 02:03 pm (UTC)And thanks for the links.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-16 02:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-17 11:59 am (UTC)