randomness: (Default)
[personal profile] randomness
From http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2008/10/22/17316/montier-analysts-are-rubbish/:

"Seemingly everyone, on both sides of the Atlantic, is now taking about recession. Even [Bank of England governor] Mervyn King.

"So why, asks SocGen’s James Montier in his latest issue of Mind Matters, is the investment research industry still predicting earnings growth of between 12 and 15 per cent?

"He’s got a chart to illustrate that analysts are exceptionally good at one thing and one thing alone - telling you what has just happened."


Memo to analysts: management haven’t got a clue. They don’t know any better than the rest of us. One of the great delusions of our industry is that we all expect corporate managers to know more than we do. Whilst their knowledge may be deeper than ours, it certainly doesn’t translate into a better ability to forecast the future…

It is this optimism that is being drip-fed to analysts, who, seemingly incapable of any form of independent thought, are happy to regurgitate management’s mindless drivel to investors. This raises yet more questions as to why it is that we all employ so many analysts, if their major function is just to be a quasi-IR department for corporates.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-10-22 03:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] meepodeekin.livejournal.com
That chart is hi-f*cking-larious. So true, too.

Of course, if analysts told us what had just happened with more info and insight than anyone else, they'd still be doing a useful job. Just not the job they think they're doing.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-10-22 04:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] holmes-iv.livejournal.com
I concur 100%, on both points. But especially the first one. :-D

Profile

randomness: (Default)
Randomness

November 2024

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
171819 20212223
24252627282930

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags