- Doing a search for "plus size clothing" "store locator" can get you a quick list of chain stores to try, although some of them may be a little far away.
- Just because Ashley Stewart bills itself "for the plus-size urban woman" doesn't mean you shouldn't be willing to go to Roxbury or Mattapan to check it out.
- Torrid has its own sizes for tops, but not for many other items.
- Going to Lane Bryant last can often help your budget.
- It's not that your body is the wrong shape, it's that the clothes are cut wrong for it.
- Weekdays out of shopping season are an excellent time to go clothes shopping.
Edit: This is probably also a good place to add a link to Lee Lee's Valise, though it was also a bit far for this particular expedition.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-18 11:21 am (UTC)YES YES YES!
I swear people who design and make clothing for women have never actually looked at the shape of a woman.
The other thing I encounter is larger women have to deal with ugly patterns and colors. And whoever thought ruffles looked good on big women is sadly mistaken. I'm big enough I don't need a flounce of ruffle to make me look bigger.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-18 12:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-18 03:05 pm (UTC)I think it bears repeating to everyone.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-18 04:02 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-18 09:34 pm (UTC)On the other hand, I realize why this happens. The more size configurations, the greater the inventory carrying costs and the greater the need for educated consumers and sales staff. I just wish that brands and stores were more explicit in the figure they size for and that more brands catered to a diversity of figures and shapes.
Ruffles are a personal choice--I have opinions on their place on me, but I agree that they have their place for others.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-18 09:44 pm (UTC)Sure.
Men's clothes generally have more size configurations but fewer available varieties of styles and colors. It had never occurred to me that those two characteristics might be related.
I just wish that brands and stores were more explicit in the figure they size for and that more brands catered to a diversity of figures and shapes.
That really would be useful. Again, my impression is that men's clothes often cater to more diverse body shapes: dress shirts, for example, usually have two size measurements per garment, as do trousers.
Two measurements is itself a great oversimplification, but it gives many more permutations than one.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-18 12:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-18 12:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-18 03:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-18 04:24 pm (UTC)They certainly give that impression. And it does seem to be extra-bad with (though certainly not limited to) plus-sized women -- for instance, they don't just make things wider, but size *everything* up: sleeves get longer, the distance between shoulders and bust darts gets longer, etc. Apparently we're supposed to get taller when we get fatter -- who knew? Because the actual women I know really don't gain much weight, say, across their shoulders.
Someone recently pointed out eShakti to me, and I'm very intrigued -- apparently you can customize to your measurements for really an absurdly small charge, and you can change details like putting wider straps on a sundress so bra straps stay covered, making a skirt longer or shorter, etc. And the stuff is cute, at least in pictures! I'm definitely going to check them out the next time I need a new dress.