randomness: (Default)
[personal profile] randomness
Muddy Waters Research accuses it of being a "a multi-billion dollar ponzi scheme", "accompanied by substantial theft".

John Hempton observes:
There is a cottage industry in doing forensic analysis of Chinese frauds. I have analysed many and put only a smattering on the blog.

But I have never seen anything this big or this amazing.

Read the report. I am in awe.
Felix Salmon explains:
What’s certain is that in the wake of all this, either Sino-Forest or Muddy Waters is going to lose all credibility: one of them is a multi-million-dollar fraud. Muddy Waters is short Sino-Forest, of course. If Sino-Forest turns out to be a slightly dodgy Chinese forestry company and not a Ponzi scheme, you can be sure that Muddy Waters has been covering its short all day and has banked a huge amount of money by putting out extremely misleading material. On the other hand, if Muddy Waters is right, then Sino-Forest is toast.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-06-06 12:13 pm (UTC)
bryant: (Default)
From: [personal profile] bryant
There's an interesting similarity between the reputed ease of believing that a Chinese forestry company is corrupt and the ease of believing that J. Random Gold Farmer is Chinese. Financial bugaboo of the times, I guess.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-06-07 12:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] r-ness.livejournal.com
As Pearl said recently, "China's trendy".

Profile

randomness: (Default)
Randomness

November 2024

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
171819 20212223
24252627282930

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags