(no subject)

[randomness]

From "What Makes Us Happy?" in the June 2009 Atlantic magazine:

In an interview in the March 2008 newsletter to the Grant Study subjects, Vaillant was asked, “What have you learned from the Grant Study men?” Vaillant’s response: “That the only thing that really matters in life are your relationships to other people.”

Edit: an LJ friend pointed out that the article was in the Atlantic, not Harper's, and I corrected.

Comments

[bloodstones.livejournal.com]

That is absolutely a failing of the study, but it's the longest running longitudinal study ever, a design fault of the original investigators doesn't render 70 years of data useless.
Also, although they don't seem to mention it in the article (I only skimmed) there was a similar study started with inner-city, under privileged men that got absorbed by this one. And while that doesn't deal with the gender issue, it does deal with the class issue.

[r-ness.livejournal.com]

It's here:

"Vaillant also dramatically expanded his scope by taking over a defunct study of juvenile delinquents in inner-city Boston, run by the criminologists Sheldon and Eleanor Glueck. Launched in 1939, the study had a control group of nondelinquent boys who grew up in similar circumstances—children of poor, mostly foreign-born parents, about half of whom lived in a home without a tub or a shower. In the 1970s, Vaillant and his staff tracked down most of these nondelinquent boys—it took years—so that today the Harvard Study of Adult Development consists of two cohorts, the “Grant men” and the “Glueck men.” Vaillant also arranged to interview a group of women from the legendary Stanford Terman study, which in the 1920s began to follow a group of high-IQ kids in California."