(no subject)
Apr. 18th, 2015 11:33 pmWhat I am about to say may be heresy in some quarters, but after watching and using a water boiler at both my parents' and at our friends S and P's I have become convinced that I am more likely to buy a water boiler (https://www.zojirushi.com/app/category/water-boilers) than I am an electric kettle (http://www.housetohome.co.uk/product-idea/picture/10-of-the-best-electric-kettles).
I would likely turn off the annoyatron that plays the electronic tune telling you the water has reached set temperature, however.
I would likely turn off the annoyatron that plays the electronic tune telling you the water has reached set temperature, however.
(no subject)
Date: 2015-04-18 04:22 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-04-18 05:07 pm (UTC)Personally I brew coffee using pourover methods, so the gooseneck is important to me and I think the kettle is superior to the boiler in my use cases, but I too am curious as to reasons since there may be things I don't know.
(no subject)
Date: 2015-04-18 07:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-04-18 11:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-04-18 06:09 pm (UTC)A standard kettle boils water. You put it on heat, and when enough steam goes through the hole, you get a sound telling you to take it off. I'd say an electric kettle is a kettle, but electric. Something where you can have different temps, and keep warm settings - these are not features of what *I* would call an electric kettle.
Although maybe we're playing with semantics here?
As for risk - They use water boilers in Japan all the time. The risk is very low. Then again, I also have no problem leaving my slow cooker running for 8h (and that's also a simple model, with just warm/low/hi/off settings).
And as someone who might want 4 cups of tea in 6 hours in an evening, 30 mins of keeping warm is a waste for me.