Inspired by...

[randomness]

...an ironic comment from dpolicar, and a (friends-locked) posting from redhound.

"(P)eople really don't read what you write. They read some sort of virtual text constructed from your title, a few fragments of your text, and whatever preconceptions may be stimulated by them. It's sort of amazing watching people rant about your failure to consider things you explicitly addressed."

"Hey, what do you have against reactions that completely miss your point? You want us all to understand you and respond relevantly, or something?"

I'd extend this to say that it's not just that people don't read what you write, they don't listen to what you say, or even watch what you do. As drbitch once observed, humans write stories; it's what they do. But they often pay more attention to the story inside their head than anything that may be playing out before them.

Comments

[marith.livejournal.com]

If I were a script-writing sort of person I would now want to create a filter you could pass a post through to see how your readers might perceive it. Maybe even with a few different bias settings and a predicted response...


Setting: Luddite

"Blah blah blah you write. Blah blah blah virtual text blah blah fragments blah, and blah stimulated by them."

Predicted reaction: "Stimulated by virtual text? Ew!"