I often get wacky trip ideas.
Nov. 15th, 2007 10:50 amSometimes I even implement them.
This is one I'm unlikely to implement, because I have more sanity than money, but here it is:
The largest 52 metropolitan areas in the world, one a week for a year!
The reasoning goes like this. I like cities, and I like travel. I've been to a lot of these places, and I'd like to visit most of the ones I haven't been to yet. (Clearly, there are exceptions: for example, I won't be going to Baghdad as a tourist until the security situation improves.)
Wikipedia and world-gazetteer.com both have lists of metro areas, which of course conflict. In fact, Wikipedia has two: a list of urban areas by population and one of urban agglomerations. (I prefer the former, because Boston/Providence is on that list at #37, while on the latter Boston is way down at #56. On world-gazetteer.com it just misses the top 50.)
Needless to say, this trip would be very expensive and quite a test of stamina. Even if I didn't visit them in order of population, but chose some (relatively) sane geographic order instead.
But boy, imagine the food blogging!
This is one I'm unlikely to implement, because I have more sanity than money, but here it is:
The largest 52 metropolitan areas in the world, one a week for a year!
The reasoning goes like this. I like cities, and I like travel. I've been to a lot of these places, and I'd like to visit most of the ones I haven't been to yet. (Clearly, there are exceptions: for example, I won't be going to Baghdad as a tourist until the security situation improves.)
Wikipedia and world-gazetteer.com both have lists of metro areas, which of course conflict. In fact, Wikipedia has two: a list of urban areas by population and one of urban agglomerations. (I prefer the former, because Boston/Providence is on that list at #37, while on the latter Boston is way down at #56. On world-gazetteer.com it just misses the top 50.)
Needless to say, this trip would be very expensive and quite a test of stamina. Even if I didn't visit them in order of population, but chose some (relatively) sane geographic order instead.
But boy, imagine the food blogging!
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-15 03:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-15 04:00 pm (UTC)I think I'd want to shop the book idea around first. You may be onto something, though. It'd be a stunt, but there seems to be a market for stunt travel books.
There are a lot of third-world cities on the list, which isn't a particular problem for me, but may limit the number of potential buyers.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-15 04:13 pm (UTC)And heck, I know I'd buy it! I mean, even if it weren't written by someone I know :)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-15 06:35 pm (UTC)Anyway, I think if you planned the trip carefully, it would be exhausting but not nearly as bad as it seems on the surface. For example, spending a month and a half or two months touring China seems less tiring than "visiting 6 or eight Chinese cities." And I think it totally could produce a book-- or even multiple books. I bet you could get both a "food of the world tour" and a "touring the world's great cities" out of the same trip. One of the keys would be organizing the books coherently, but that could be part of the same process as planning the trip.
--Adam
(All that said, it might be easier to do this as several distinct regional trips: the great cities of China, the great cities of India, etc. And that would still probably be marketable.)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-18 08:26 am (UTC)But yes, I noticed that many of the cities group naturally.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-15 07:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-15 03:55 pm (UTC)FWIW, I think if you are going to travel for pleasure, it should be enjoyable and not a marathon run. YMMV:)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-15 03:58 pm (UTC)Clearly, because some people find marathon runs enjoyable.
I think I would find this more fun than you would (surprise!) but not enough to actually do it. But that's why I said I had more sanity than money.
(Unless I got funding. That would be different.)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-15 04:05 pm (UTC)If I got funding, that would be different, too, and I would seriously consider joining in:) (is that a surprise?) It would work better for me, of course, if I could figure out ways to be able to continue to swim, like at local Y's or something, but I am guessing that would be a casualty...
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-15 04:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-15 04:19 pm (UTC)Who knows--maybe Baghdad will be in better shape at that point (though I'm not holding my breath for that either).
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-15 04:20 pm (UTC)I'll stop posting now. Really:)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-15 04:19 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-15 04:28 pm (UTC)I'll have to come up sometime. The last time I came through your part of the world I was helping someone move and we came barrelling through with a van filled with her earthly possessions at an unholy hour.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-15 04:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-15 08:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-16 06:47 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-15 11:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-16 03:53 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-16 12:11 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-16 06:19 am (UTC)I'm sure you would like this. So I encourage you to do it, but it would drive me nuts to never get out of the cities.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-16 06:50 am (UTC)Totally! I seem to remember having a conversation with you about just that topic, maybe under that big awning/tent thing in your guesthouse in Siem Reap or something. Or maybe it was somewhere else, but still.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-16 06:19 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-16 05:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-17 10:04 am (UTC)Do you realize that I hit 15 of the cities on the first list on this trip alone? (19 on the second list and 46 from the first few hundred on the third list, before I became disgruntled by all the places I'm forced to skip due to time and gave up.) Holy cow.
Yes, it helps to have funding. You can use my level of (in)sanity upon my return as a gauge for whether you should attempt something like this in the future. *grin*
(It's a great idea, btw.)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-18 08:36 am (UTC)Your funding source is driving you crazy. I think maybe it would unfair to use your experience as an example? :)
(It's a great idea, btw.)
Thanks! Maybe I'll do it on a longer schedule.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-18 02:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-19 12:40 am (UTC)Rockin! I was hoping it would work out that way.