I often get wacky trip ideas.
Nov. 15th, 2007 10:50 amSometimes I even implement them.
This is one I'm unlikely to implement, because I have more sanity than money, but here it is:
The largest 52 metropolitan areas in the world, one a week for a year!
The reasoning goes like this. I like cities, and I like travel. I've been to a lot of these places, and I'd like to visit most of the ones I haven't been to yet. (Clearly, there are exceptions: for example, I won't be going to Baghdad as a tourist until the security situation improves.)
Wikipedia and world-gazetteer.com both have lists of metro areas, which of course conflict. In fact, Wikipedia has two: a list of urban areas by population and one of urban agglomerations. (I prefer the former, because Boston/Providence is on that list at #37, while on the latter Boston is way down at #56. On world-gazetteer.com it just misses the top 50.)
Needless to say, this trip would be very expensive and quite a test of stamina. Even if I didn't visit them in order of population, but chose some (relatively) sane geographic order instead.
But boy, imagine the food blogging!
This is one I'm unlikely to implement, because I have more sanity than money, but here it is:
The largest 52 metropolitan areas in the world, one a week for a year!
The reasoning goes like this. I like cities, and I like travel. I've been to a lot of these places, and I'd like to visit most of the ones I haven't been to yet. (Clearly, there are exceptions: for example, I won't be going to Baghdad as a tourist until the security situation improves.)
Wikipedia and world-gazetteer.com both have lists of metro areas, which of course conflict. In fact, Wikipedia has two: a list of urban areas by population and one of urban agglomerations. (I prefer the former, because Boston/Providence is on that list at #37, while on the latter Boston is way down at #56. On world-gazetteer.com it just misses the top 50.)
Needless to say, this trip would be very expensive and quite a test of stamina. Even if I didn't visit them in order of population, but chose some (relatively) sane geographic order instead.
But boy, imagine the food blogging!
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-15 03:55 pm (UTC)FWIW, I think if you are going to travel for pleasure, it should be enjoyable and not a marathon run. YMMV:)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-15 03:58 pm (UTC)Clearly, because some people find marathon runs enjoyable.
I think I would find this more fun than you would (surprise!) but not enough to actually do it. But that's why I said I had more sanity than money.
(Unless I got funding. That would be different.)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-15 04:05 pm (UTC)If I got funding, that would be different, too, and I would seriously consider joining in:) (is that a surprise?) It would work better for me, of course, if I could figure out ways to be able to continue to swim, like at local Y's or something, but I am guessing that would be a casualty...
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-15 04:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-15 04:19 pm (UTC)Who knows--maybe Baghdad will be in better shape at that point (though I'm not holding my breath for that either).
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-15 04:20 pm (UTC)I'll stop posting now. Really:)