In response to the ridiculous bans on pork imports from parts of North America by at least ten different countries, I propose that those of us who normally eat pork incorporate it into one more meal than usual. I started this morning with bacon. Mmmm, bacon.
I suspect these pork bans are more about raising a trade barrier than anything else.
Who's with me? For tasty pork, and against panic and protectionism!
Edit: added the word "imports" and reworded first sentence for clarity.
I suspect these pork bans are more about raising a trade barrier than anything else.
Who's with me? For tasty pork, and against panic and protectionism!
Edit: added the word "imports" and reworded first sentence for clarity.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-29 02:40 pm (UTC)It is a silly blanket ban, and I hope that people see that soon.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-29 02:44 pm (UTC)Thanks! I did.
I myself have a perfectly reasonable ban on pork in my diet. (Kashrut, and the fact that I didn't find it tasty before the kashrut issue was an issue for me personally.)
Indeed! (Thus the caveat in my original post. :) )
It is a silly blanket ban, and I hope that people see that soon.
Yes. One might as well ban poultry, as the flu virus also has genetic elements of avian flu. Only I think I shouldn't give anyone any dumb ideas.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-29 02:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-29 06:57 pm (UTC)Thanks!
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-29 02:47 pm (UTC)thanks
Date: 2009-04-29 02:48 pm (UTC)Re: thanks
Date: 2009-04-29 02:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-29 03:07 pm (UTC)I love pork. *happy sighs*
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-29 03:07 pm (UTC)In fact, for the duration of the crisis, I hereby declare that bacon is a vegetable for purposes of my vegetarian before 6 diet.
That's right, I said bacon is a vegetable.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-29 06:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-29 03:32 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-29 03:37 pm (UTC)My problem is that kathrynt tends to respond to the current idiodicy before I've even been exposed to the idiodicy, and so I'm going, no, no, people aren't THAT dumb, are they?
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-29 05:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-29 03:39 pm (UTC)It was
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-29 04:47 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-29 05:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-29 05:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-29 05:29 pm (UTC)(Is *that* why it was on sale at whole foods?)
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-29 05:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-29 07:00 pm (UTC)Unless you're a politician.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-29 06:37 pm (UTC)Out of curiosity, have pork prices started falling yet in response to all this? That seems like a likely result, and provides an opportunity for the well-informed to get cheap and yummy pork products, but I haven't checked out the pricing.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-29 07:36 pm (UTC)I note that Sibelius soared through after weeks of slow going.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-30 01:30 pm (UTC)Also according to the NPR report this morning, the Egyptian government has been dealing with the Bird flu for a while by trying to address by improving the hygiene of people handling birds. So a concern for how people are interacting with animals has been demonstrated previously. It also sounds like there have been calls to move the pigs outside city limits for a while.
All that said, killing every pig in Egypt does sound like a stupid thing to do (currently, the herd is healthy, they'll have to import more pigs who may be infected if they want to rebuild the industry!). I can also see how the fact that the industry is controlled by a religious minority enables this sort of across the board silliness.
I do support the "Eat Pork" campaign proposed above, and went out and bought a tenderloin last night. mmm, pork!
(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-01 05:42 am (UTC)As a matter of fact, yes:
http://uk.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUKTRE53T5A520090430
"At the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, where cattle and hog prices are set daily, hog prices tumbled this week. The actively traded June hog futures was down 3 percent Thursday morning at 64.700 cents per lb, and down nearly 10 percent since Friday."
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-29 07:32 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-29 09:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-01 06:06 pm (UTC)