Too wrong.

Feb. 14th, 2005 06:51 pm
randomness: (Default)
[personal profile] randomness
From [livejournal.com profile] resonance42 (who had the discretion to hide it in a friends-locked post):

hp_hardcore presents Hardcore Valentines! Click here to get your own!

(Harry Potter images with R-rated captioning added. And no, I won't pick one.)

Edit: Maybe some of those captions cross into NC-17 territory.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-02-15 12:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] restruction.livejournal.com
R-rated? I'm not sure the MPAA would let some of these slip by without an NC-17 rating.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-02-15 12:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] r-ness.livejournal.com
Yah, you're totally right. I was going to say something like "high R", but then figured it was enough warning.

On the other hand, I think I'll edit...

(no subject)

Date: 2005-02-15 12:26 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] restruction.livejournal.com
Haha, this just gave me a hilarious idea for a fake press release:

"A source close to the production have announced that Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix will be directed by John Waters. 'Frankly,' the source, who wished to remain unidentified, said, 'We were unhappy with the direction that [Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire director] Mike [Newell] was taking the franchise, at which point John [Waters] approached us with some innovative new ideas that I think will breathe a whole new life into the series.' Rumor has it that some of the cast is not quite as pleased with this change, but no official statements have been made."

(no subject)

Date: 2005-02-15 12:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] r-ness.livejournal.com
...trying to stifle laughter in public place... :)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-02-15 12:31 am (UTC)
merlinofchaos: (Default)
From: [personal profile] merlinofchaos
(who had the discretion to hide it in a friends-locked post)

And yet YOU had to share with the WORLD.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-02-15 12:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] r-ness.livejournal.com
Why, certainly. I didn't want to hide this light under a bushel... :)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-02-15 01:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tamago.livejournal.com
My eyes! My eyes! It burns! ;-)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-02-15 05:01 am (UTC)
beowabbit: (Default)
From: [personal profile] beowabbit
I was disappointed that there wasn't anything about the Invisibility Cloak in there. Although sneaking into the showers is probably far too tame for that set. :-)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-02-15 06:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] r-ness.livejournal.com
Although sneaking into the showers is probably far too tame for that set.

Clearly. :)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-02-15 01:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nafe.livejournal.com
This sucks. I'm working for 10 hours today, and now there's this thing that I fear may be innappropriate to view at work. But I get so BORED here sometimes. And I forgot my book again. We'll see how long I hold out.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-02-15 06:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] r-ness.livejournal.com
now there's this thing that I fear may be innappropriate to view at work.

It's borderline, yah. It depends on your workplace, I'd think.

Wait, what am I saying? That response is completely lacking in useful information. I can think of workplaces where viewing porn is part of the job description. So, obviously it depends on your workplace.

I'm groggy today.

Profile

randomness: (Default)
Randomness

November 2024

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
171819 20212223
24252627282930

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags