A scrap from yesterday's conversation.
Sep. 13th, 2007 12:53 pmSex is communication. If someone is a bad communicator out of bed, it's unlikely they'll be a good communicator in bed. Possible, but unlikely.
Edit: A number of commenters have drawn a distinction between verbal and non-verbal communication, and assumed I meant "verbal=out of bed"; "non-verbal=in bed". That is not what I posted. I do find it noteworthy that people make that assumption.
Edit: A number of commenters have drawn a distinction between verbal and non-verbal communication, and assumed I meant "verbal=out of bed"; "non-verbal=in bed". That is not what I posted. I do find it noteworthy that people make that assumption.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-13 06:08 pm (UTC)I am not saying that people who communicate badly in words cannot communicate non-verbally.
I am saying that people who are bad at communicating tend to be bad at communicating regardless of the venue.
I class people who are good at communicating non-verbally as people who are good at communicating, so it's not surprising to me that they're good at communicating in bed. I've known a few people who are quite inarticulate who are good at communicating non-verbally; that's no surprise to me. Nor is it a surprise to me that they can communicate non-verbally in many contexts.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-13 06:18 pm (UTC)I think I understood your meaning and disagreed on the basis that the change of venue may allow some people to communicate in ways that they're good at whereas other venues do not.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-13 06:21 pm (UTC)Here is a rephrase of what I was saying:
If you find that someone is a lousy communicator, do not expect them to suddenly become a good one if you change venues.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-13 06:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-13 06:28 pm (UTC)I do interact with people a lot non-verbally out of bed, so I think I get to see a lot more of that that aspect of their communication style before I sleep with them.