The news about the Carnival Triumph and its recent troubles got me to looking into the line's recent record:
Is this number of incidents normal for cruise lines? Is Carnival Cruise lines known to be more accident prone than other lines? They do have a large fleet, so I suppose it could just be random chance, but it doesn't seem like a good record.
I don't know the first thing about cruise lines and their reputations, so I'm asking.
- On November 8, 2010, a fire broke out in the generator room of the Carnival Splendor and the ship lost most power.
- On January 13, 2012, the Costa Concordia, operated by a Carnival subsidiary, ran aground off Isola del Giglio, Tuscany. The ship capsized and partially sank, killing 32 people.
- In March 2012, the Costa Allegra, owned by Carnival Cruise Lines' Costa Cruises subsidiary, suffered an engine room fire and went adrift in the Indian Ocean.
- In February 2013, the Carnival Triumph, with 3,143 passengers aboard, suffered an engine room fire, leaving the ship adrift for days in the Gulf of Mexico.
Is this number of incidents normal for cruise lines? Is Carnival Cruise lines known to be more accident prone than other lines? They do have a large fleet, so I suppose it could just be random chance, but it doesn't seem like a good record.
I don't know the first thing about cruise lines and their reputations, so I'm asking.
(no subject)
Date: 2013-02-14 07:49 pm (UTC)It all made sense... scary sense... but sense... in explaining why there are so many dangerous issues on cruise ships.
The cruise lines operate their ships virtually 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 52 weeks a year. Cruise ships do not make money unless they are operating. The cruise lines push the ships just as hard as they push their crew members. A ship out of service for a week for routine maintenance means the loss of tens of millions of dollars and thousands of dissatisfied customers.
(no subject)
Date: 2013-02-14 08:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-02-14 09:04 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-02-14 09:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-02-14 11:46 pm (UTC)And at least JV travel, unlike JV poly, is something I've successfully avoided. (Oh god, so not proud of my JV poly moments.)
(no subject)
Date: 2013-02-15 06:04 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-02-15 07:11 am (UTC)I think using JV to describe a proficiency level is more true to the original coining of the term than to use it as a challenge rating.
There are some people or combinations of people who would be very challenging to date. I once might have been interested in taking on that challenge, but now I might think carefully about why I wanted to do act on that before I did.
I think that's either experience or fatigue.
(no subject)
Date: 2013-02-15 02:54 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-02-15 03:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-02-15 05:38 pm (UTC)That last bit is unusual. It probably speaks to just how bad a PR disaster this has been.